Indian Army Reopens Mega Race To Replace Vintage Anti-Air Guns

PHOTO / SAINIK SAMACHAR

The Indian Army has finally set the ball rolling again on a long-festering modernisation compulsion — replacing its very old air defence guns deployed in border sectors as a last line of defence against hostile air intrusions. And while there is little by way of assurance that the Army will be able to successfully navigate the rebooted drive to a conclusive contract, the decks stand cleared. The Army has formally announced, for the third time in the last eight years, a requirement of 938 guns to replace in-service Swedish Bofors L-70 and Russian ZU-23MM-2B guns, most of which stand deployed to protect military installations in forward areas. The replacement program will be the first major step to end years of stop-gap efforts that have sought to upgrade and life-extend the in-service weaponry.

Any contract down this path could be worth in excess of $3 billion.

The Army has also indicated its preference for the Buy (Indian Designed, Developed and Manufactured) category of the Defence Procurement Procedure, that would limit the prospective contest to guns of Indian origin. It has however left the door to open to more realistic category of Buy and Make (Indian) that involves local production of a ready foreign system. Companies likely to line up for the contest include India’s L&T, Tata, Kalyani Defence, Punj Lloyd and Mahindra Defence.

By way of an information request send to global vendors, the Army has stated that the guns ‘should have the capability to engage fighter aircraft, transport aircraft, helicopters (including hovering helicopters), Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) / Drones, Cruise missiles, PGMs, RAM (Rocket, Arty & Mortar), Micro light aircraft, para motors, Para gliders and Aero models.’ The Army has also revealed that it is looking for 5,05,920 rounds of ammunition with the purchase, including 1,63,200 smart 3P rounds.

In 2009, the Army began an exercise to upgrade its Zu-23 and L-70 guns with new electro-optical systems, shortlisting the state-owned BEL and private sector Punj Lloyd in 2015. Upgrading and replacing its vintage air defence guns have both proven elusive to the Indian Army, despite high-level calls — including by an Army Chief in 2011-12 — on how dire the situation was. The Army’s new request for information may be seen as only another attempt to embark upon an equipment replacement drive that stubbornly refused to lift off for over a decade now.

But like with most things in Indian defence procurement, there’s a searing irony to the rebooted hunt for air defence guns.

If budgetary pressures and priorities have played their part in stalling modernisation of the army’s air defence regiments, it hasn’t been a problem at all at the higher end of the air defence requirement. The push for basic guns comes just weeks after India pulled the trigger on its biggest ever weaponry deal, for S-400 Triumf missile systems — the system that will be, in effect, the big daddy of India’s multi-layered air defence network. Nor has India had a problem progressing, albeit with stumbles and delays, the very short range air defence system (VSHORADS) contest, even though the latter has hit trouble with vendors weighing the option of protesting a Russian win in court. In September, the Indian MoD also approved the acquisition of 2 more regiments of the indigenous Akash surface-to-air missile system for the Indian Air Force.

The fleet-footedness with which India has concluded high-value deals for high performance air defence weaponry, while allowing crucial basics to languish for over a decade have also contributed to questions of how the various layers will ‘talk’ to each other — and whether the S-400 layer can successfully ‘hand over’ a target to, for instance, the Akash SAM system. The result, on one recent occasion when journalists visited Moscow, was some hard-nosed levity.

Earlier this year, the Indian Air Force set the ball rolling to acquire 244 close-in weapon systems — guns to protect its air bases, a mission profile currently fulfilled by the Indian Army’s old air defence guns. The new CIWS program looks to transfer the responsibility of ‘last layer’ air defence of air force bases to the Indian Air Force.

1 thought on “Indian Army Reopens Mega Race To Replace Vintage Anti-Air Guns”

  1. The most interesting AA-Guns at the present day are :
    1.) NBS (Rheinmetall) MANTIS, an automated turret with the 35mm/1000 RPM Millenium Gun. The 35mm shells separate in 152 aerodynamic pellets in a pre-programmed manner just when entering the interception area. It may not shoot as fast as a double 30mm Gatling e.g. AK-630M2 or Kashtan but instead of 2x 5,000 RPM, you have 152,000 RPM in the end… Anything entering the range will have to go through a wall of metal. More classic 35mm shells can be used.
    MANTIS protects German bases, you have 6 turrets with FLIR, a remote command post and a radar.
    For sure it can easily be mounted on a truck, IFV or APC.
    It also retraces trajectory and gives coordinates for counter-battery fire.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xxcW8H1mfo

    2.) Oto Melara 76/62 Super-Rapid.
    This 76mm Navy-Gun is very common on ships, being used by 46 nations including India!
    But few know there is also a land version named Draco
    http://www.military-today.com/artillery/draco.jpg
    (well, I consider a biggest IFV or a truck would have been better : too few ammos loaded to my taste, nevertheless…). And that the guided DART ammunition allows to go after aerial targets at up to 8km with 80-120 RPM. It can intercept as low as 2m altitude, perform 40 manoeuvres. At 1200m/s, it’s twice as fast as a ManPADS. It still can be used as naval or land classic artillery or with the guided VULCANO shell able to hit with great accuracy at… 40km…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGPFn-KHESs

    Now it’d also surely be interesting to re-use the Bofors L/70 57mm in a CIWS/C-RAM turret context. The Bofors L/70 navy gun fires 200RPM and has an interesting magazine. With an effective turret and shells thought on the MANTIS or DART principles, L/70 still has potential, the gun is a classic, so is the old-school Zu-57-2 which also could be highly modernised

    In the classics CIWS/C-RAM, you also have AK-630M2 with 2x GSh-6-30 or the Goalkeeper (using the A-10’s gun).

    I don’t think I would trust Pantsir a lot, after several have been blasted by Israelis, especially the one where 2 missiles missed and which’s gun didn’t even reacted. Now, Syrian air defences personnels are far from being champions too… Nevertheless, in case of multi-layer air defences, my choices would be, at least on paper :
    1.) NBS MANTIS
    2.) OTO MELARA 76/62 Super-Rapid
    3.) Iron-Dome
    4.) Either David’s Sling or SAMP/T
    5.) Arrow-3, but maybe having S-500’s 77N6 missile or A-235, eventually RIM-161D SM-3 block-IIA…
    The problem with Russian systems being data-fusion to merge them into an IADS with non-Russian assets through stuff like Link-16 etc…
    e.g. as early warnings, I’d consider ONERA’s Nostradamus OTH as largest layer. as 2nd layer. As all OTHs, won’t work under 800km, nevertheless, you see a B-2 coming from 3000km and it’s the only 360° OTH, then, mounting a Nebo-M (VHF/AESA) on (or in, just like the Goodyear ZPG-3W AKA EZ-1C) blimp, maybe the Airlander 10 or 50 could do the job.
    Completing with the AN/TPY-2 on 400m high pylons like the Dimona radar or again, blimp mounted, could be interesting since this X-band AESA has huge range and allows seriously accurate targetting solutions.
    Now there are other interesting stuff like Don-2N (or its successor), AN/FPS-129, Voronezh, LRDR (Long Range Discrimination Radar), etc…
    It’d deserve a serious study. BTW, just think that Don-2N in US SIOP, would be targetted by 69 contiguous launches of nuclear ballistic missiles in case of war with Russia!!! Personally, I’d disguise such facilities in a way nobody would think it has such use 😉
    Now an IADS+A2/AD needs many other assets, and not only active radars and missiles… ONERA has many good ideas on the subject…

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scroll to Top