There seems to be two variants here and you seem to have mixed up the two set of images. The 2nd and 4th are same design variant and 1st and 3rd are of same type.
Nice pics, great post,but these are baby steps(slow progression of (A1,A2,A3,A5), we need to move ahead in leaps and bounds, also, who is the bright artist, I am sure its not MFH.
Today, read the article in BRF about defence procument process which goes at snail pace ( 20 yrs minimum for a deal to be finalized), its so shamefull, why as a society have we become like this, Indians used to brightest and smartest in technology and medicine, astronomy etc even in ancient age,,what has gone so wrong that we have been taken over by greed and corruption and this has left us stupid, weak, and rather laughable.
Arun is publicity hungry, had it been his drawings he would be boasting about it by now on other forum that he is on. Beside anyone can do this picture job, not a great deal.
I am sorry if Arun V thinks he owns the images. From the perspective of copyright law, how many different ways can you represent a missile ? Agni III or Agni V has only certain parameters and certain assumptions that every smart chap can make. Not just some smart ass Arun V who thinks he is the king of the Missile universe with fanciful notions of super-power rangers of missiles which are not verifed.
I don't see any problem with these rendering from CR perspective. Ideas are not protected under copyright law but expressions. If i had seen the same image made by AV i would cry foul. I don't see them here. If at the same time these were renderings of a model that did not exist earlier in 2d which are reproduced in 3d here AV could have cried horse.
Just move on folks and learn about copyright before you piggy tail behind AV and his antics. Unreliable source that he is …
great work Shiv
So how many war heads are there on this baby
There seems to be two variants here and you seem to have mixed up the two set of images. The 2nd and 4th are same design variant and 1st and 3rd are of same type.
Looks like the 3-d rendering of Arun Vishwakarma's drawings in BR forum (when he was associated with it)
Hey Shiv,
Who did these drawings, are these official DRDO Renderings, or is it done by a Private Individual on what he assumes the Agni 5 will look like.
Cheers
Adarsh
It would be nice to give due credit to the artist.
Nice pics, great post,but these are baby steps(slow progression of (A1,A2,A3,A5), we need to move ahead in leaps and bounds, also, who is the bright artist, I am sure its not MFH.
Today, read the article in BRF about defence procument process which goes at snail pace ( 20 yrs minimum for a deal to be finalized), its so shamefull, why as a society have we become like this, Indians used to brightest and smartest in technology and medicine, astronomy etc even in ancient age,,what has gone so wrong that we have been taken over by greed and corruption and this has left us stupid, weak, and rather laughable.
I think it's impression of Arun Vishwakarma of India-Forum (ex-BRFite).
I don't know of anybody else who can do these drawings.
Arun is publicity hungry, had it been his drawings he would be boasting about it by now on other forum that he is on. Beside anyone can do this picture job, not a great deal.
Any idea why was he thrown out from BR?
Here Arun V is accusing Shiv Aroor of impropriety in a way!
>>>>> Shiv Aroor is referring to 3 D rendering of Agni -2 m dia missile and warheads, that were generated from my 2 D drawing dimensions<<<<<<
http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/2357-indian-missile-news-and-discussion/page__view__findpost__p__105271
I am sorry if Arun V thinks he owns the images. From the perspective of copyright law, how many different ways can you represent a missile ? Agni III or Agni V has only certain parameters and certain assumptions that every smart chap can make. Not just some smart ass Arun V who thinks he is the king of the Missile universe with fanciful notions of super-power rangers of missiles which are not verifed.
I don't see any problem with these rendering from CR perspective. Ideas are not protected under copyright law but expressions.
If i had seen the same image made by AV i would cry foul. I don't see them here. If at the same time these were renderings of a model that did not exist earlier in 2d which are reproduced in 3d here AV could have cried horse.
Just move on folks and learn about copyright before you piggy tail behind AV and his antics. Unreliable source that he is …